Film Girl interrupted Essay

Susanna Kaysen is the author of Girl Interrupted, her memoirs that explore a two-year occlusive that she spent as a patient in a psychical institution for young women. Split into three sections, read/write head versus paper, the clinical commentary of a mete personality disorder, and her diagnosis, her memoirs serve as an argument against her clinical diagnosis. In Mind vs. Brain we atomic number 18 given a laypersons introduction to psychology. Kaysen, through the use of various writing techniques, ex field of operations to the clean contributor what psychology is. Then, as a preface to her main argument, we be shown the different aspects of a borderline personality disorder and how iodine is diagnosed. on with this scientific methodology, Kaysen infuses her own thoughts and opinions. And fin eithery, she presents us with her argument where she explores her purport as a young woman how conformity and period sex roles landed her in a mental institution.She revisits her friends and the events that occurred over 20 years ago go she was a member of the institution. finished her exploration, we the subscriber get to know her reveal by understanding the views and beliefs of the times and her personal struggle against conformity. Battling the role of women in society, Kaysen exemplifies the classic protagonist. She tells her recital to revisit a past that she has locked away, and to educate employ her life and experiences as a novel example. By applying the literary techniques of explanation, narrative, and figural speech communication, Kaysen employs a unique writing style, the fusion of these persuasive techniques, to lure the commentator in and keep them wanting to a greater extent.There is a wide novelty of figurative language busy through discover this piece that is essential to the force of Kaysens writing. The most nonable application of figurative language employed by Kaysen is seen in her introduction, the exploration of the mind and brain. Im youre mind, you cant parse me into dendrites and synapses (269). And with this statement, Kaysen personifies the human mind. Having a living airing personality, the endorser is able to draw a picture of it and see in a brighter light what she is explaining. She expands on this, explaining the interaction in the brain creation that of two interpreters, one reporter and one newborns analyst. She turns the mind into a collection of conversations instead of a ball of gray matter. While this fantasy of gray matter is tangible, our minds can graspthe idea of constantly battling interpreters. She continues by providing the reader with a model of the conversation that occurs in the human mind. representative wizard Theres a tiger in the corner. phonation Two No, thats not a tiger thats a bureau.Interpreter One Its a tiger, its a tigerInterpreter Two Dont be ridiculous. Lets go look at it.(270)The dialogue acts as a small play that the reader can act give away in his/ her mind. By creating this metaphor, Kaysen is able to portray to the reader what many psychology textbooks very such(prenominal)(prenominal) snuff it at doing She explains how the mind works on a simple level. She and so lays this healthy model with one that is afflicted by mental illness. Simply, the reader fits what separates a healthy mind from an ill one. This approach to modeling the brain is legal because she stretches out her sign thesis on the mind to orthodontic braces her discussion of the mind and brain. It is effective because she doesnt begin her exploration by scaling the peaks of Everest. She traverses the foothills first, proceeds to hiking, and then begins her ascent of the mountain itself. Many scientific approaches to modeling the human mind begin at the top and pass judgment its structure through soil composition, climate, biodiversity, and more. simply, Kaysen starts at the roots and crawls slowly up through the branches, making sure not to jump or scurry over any necessary parts.Next, she deals with the role of psychoanalysts in the field. She comp ares their work to reporting on a ground they have never visited. This conclusion to her initial thesis is quite an effective in summing up the information she presented on the mind and brain. Basically, she explains that you can never really understand what is going on in the mind of a mental patient without being in their shoes and experiencing it foryourself. Psychoanalysts have been writing op-ed pieces about the workings of a country theyve never trave take to, (272) is how Kaysen puts it. One could interpret her metaphor as pointing out that they are hypocrites, but it is more accurately a suggestion she puts forward you cant understand mental illness fully without real having been a member in its society. This is perhaps why Kaysen is able to secernate the mind with such ease. The language and style employed by Susanna Kaysen in this literary work plays a profound role in win over the reader of her beliefs.Kaysens use of description in this piece gives the reader insight to her life and has a profound impact on her argument. perhaps the most important definition Kaysen applies throughout this paper is that of a borderline personality disorder. The purpose of this whole argument is to deconstruct the clinical definition by picking away at the invalid claims it cites, and proving her point she was wrong diagnosed. Her whole argument teeters on the failure of the clinical definition to accurately classify a mental illness. Clinically, a borderline personality is sort out by a pervasive pattern of instability of self-image, interpersonal relationships, and manner (272). She later argues against this claim of instability explaining that this is what defines teenagers. Teenagers, according to Kaysen, are uncertain of who they are and what their futures hold.She also explores the concept of an unhealthy self-image further, which is central to the clinical diagnosis. I aphorism myself, quite correctly, as unfit for the educational and social system. But, others image of me was unstable, since it was out of kilter with reality. (277) Reality, as Kaysen implies it, is adherence to the role of a young woman. She was different, plain and simple. Nowadays we classify different as good. We equate difference with individualism and everyone strives to be unique these days we are all searching for that one thing that separates us from the rest of the crowd.Another aspect of the clinical definition is a chronic sense of emptiness and boredom. Kaysen comes clean and admits to this but not without providing a defense against it. She felt desolation, despair, and depression, (279) as a direct resolving of societal pressures, conformity, and being different. No one understood her and this whole perpetuated more feelings of solitude andisolation. This method of deconstruction is effective because it structures her argument. Her purpose is to provide a defense against this clinical definition. The reader, presented with a comprehensive and in-depth definition of the disorder, is able to juxtapose clinical theory with personal reality and see more understandably Kaysens point. This method is very effective in persuading the reader and is often employed in arguments to disprove a belief or position. It allows her to tend easily from science to personal experience and acts as a cohere between the two, thereby making her writing a singular entity.Through the use of narratives, the reader comprehends Kaysens position and is able to explore her life in first person. In the third section, where Kaysen discusses her diagnosis and time at the hospital, we explore her life through a personal narrative. This section is quite important because it is where she begins to pull apart the clinical definition she cited in the preceding section. We, the reader, get to see first hand what was going on in Kaysens mind as a teenager . She talks of her uncertainties, incapacities, wrist-banging, desolation and depression, self-image and a good deal more. Her discussion of wrist-banging is one of the more memorable vignettes. She describes sitting on her butterfly chair in her room and participating in this extracurricular activity. We learn from her story that these activities were not a result of self-deprecation, but more a result of inner pain and isolation because she wasnt like everyone else and muckle resented her for it.Having no one to relate to, and no one to confide in, she was left wing by herself to constantly question who and what she was. Being a teenager and not having the answers to societys questions, she could not help but be led to such activities. This particular story is compelling because it arouses feeling in the reader and creates a sense of feeling and understanding for her and the trouble she has been put through. roughly(prenominal) cynics would simply chalk this up to a deliber ate emotional approach of the author, but Kaysen has established that all she can do is give the particulars an annotated diagnosis, (275) and kick in the rest up to our interpretation. We can be assured that Kaysens conception in revealing this activity serves no more purpose than tell her story.She also explains her incapacities. She was living a life based on them, (277) much like many other kids. We all are bogged down by what we cant do. It depresses us and thwarts our progression. It wasnt her incapacities that stopped her, it was those around her. She didnt provide any groundsable explanation for these refusals, and perhaps that is why it move so much attention. If she had told them why then maybe they could just nowify her feelings. But not doing so only perpetuated questions and suspicion. The reader can relate to this irresolution because we have all experienced a time in our lives when we just didnt care about anything. The quintessential teenager is characterized by a chronic indecisiveness towards life. By exploring this aspect, Kaysen is able to draw the reader impendent to her and makes this technique an effective strategy in her argument.Finally, in her narrative, she explores what clinicians call immature death and her own experience with Daisys death. She admits that she had thought of death, but the idea of it worked on her like a purgative, (279) and she always came to the final conclusion that it would only make things worse. Her ability to reason gives the reader more insight towards her diagnosis. She could reason between the two interpreters in her mind. She could separate illusion from reality and these abilities strongly emphasized her argument. The use of Kaysens narrative in this piece plays an inviolate role in convincing the reader and is effective in its purpose. Without such a persuasive strategy, Kaysens case would be poorly constructed, and deficient in support.While Kaysens unique writing format infuses new ideas into the readers mind, I do concede that there are several instances where these styles have limitations and even perpetuate a state of amazement in the reader. The main problem with Kaysens highly figurative language is that not everyone can follow or relate to it. This prevents those who cannot make a connection with her metaphors and analogies from understanding what she so eloquently writes about. This is a common prohibition faced by writers to simplify or elaborate. While simplifying opens your ideas to all readers, it stifles your exploration and sometimes prevents you from proving your point. Contrastingly, elaborating on your simple statements can lead to a scramble ofdisjointed thoughts with no apparent connection.One must be wary. One must ride the thin border between the two and last it is the decision of the writer which route is proper. While Kaysen teeters on the brink of both, in the end she comes through and accomplishes her purpose to present a multitude of pr emise against her clinical diagnosis. Without elaborating in places, the reader would be left outside her mind unable to see her innermost thoughts and experiences. It is Susanna Kaysens ability to flirt on this border, above all others, that distinguishes her writing technique and makes it effective in accompaniment her argument.In light of this support, Kaysen is able to gain recognition from the reader. Perhaps most profound is the emotion that her writing induces, leaving the reader in a state of reflection and questioning, and a state of compassion for her and her tribulations. The most effective tool a writer has is the ability to bring about emotion in the reader. This can be considered a basic requirement of all art forms to promote an emotion that pushes the subject to reflect on the story laid before them and their lives. All good art accomplishes this on some level and Girl Interrupted is no exception.